Venezuela's Chavez Calls for Obama to End U.S. Embargo on Cuba
By Steven Bodzin
Nov. 2 (Bloomberg) -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez called for U.S. Senator Barack Obama, favored in opinion polls to win the presidential election on Nov. 4, to end his country's trade embargo of Cuba.
``A black man may become president of the U.S., and we can say that's no small thing,'' Chavez said in a speech on state television. ``Hopefully, the next government of the U.S. will listen to the mandate, not just of morals, ethics and the times, but also the mandate of the UN that days ago voted, once more, asking the U.S. to eliminate its savage blockade of Cuba.''
The U.S. declared a trade embargo on Cuba almost 50 years ago and has maintained it in the face of criticism from around the world. In a United Nations vote Oct. 29, 185 nations pressed the U.S. to drop the embargo, with only the U.S., Israel and Palau voting against the resolution.
Venezuela is one of Cuba's closest allies. Chavez referred to Cuba's government during the broadcast as having a common government with Venezuela, and he offered his customary greeting to Fidel Castro, the former Cuban president, by saying ``How are you, Fidel?'' in English.
Chavez also called on the U.S. to end ``threats'' against Venezuela and Iran, without elaborating.
To contact the reporter on this story: Steven Bodzin in Caracas at sbodzin@bloomberg.net
This article is from: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=akxvk6N5NAOE&refer=latin_america
I did not know that our Embargo on Cuba was so widely criticized. It shocked me that only three countries in the entire world voted for it. I also thought that this article demonstrated how strong of an ally Israel is, and that Palau is clearly trying to get on our good side. I also don't see how the embargo can be all that effective since no one else is participating in it. It also seems that if this Embargo is effecting Cuba in such a strong way, it is probably effecting the United States as Well. My last thought on it was that John McCain is not addressed in the article at all. I wonder if this is because they do not think he will be elected or if they think that he will be to stubborn if he is.
Posts
